Listening
to the video, How Companies Can Make
Better Decisions, Faster, everything Marcia had to say kind of made the light
bulb go on for me as far as understanding a bit better on how some companies
have great success whereas others not so much.
Employee engagement and how it relates to decision effectiveness can be
as simple as decisions that are made that are sound and well thought out but
not drawn out. When leaders make clear
and concise decisions employees will feel that leaders are making these
decisions with them in mind and it makes for a better working environment as
well. Making decisions should be easier
not harder and this in turn will make for a more interesting place to
work.
If
you have a board or committee of leaders who make the decisions for the organization
as a whole and they can’t seem to agree or be on the same page or they want to
involve too many people, it slows down progress across the organization. It makes you wonder what is going on. I experienced this when I was on a board last
year and we had 10 people on the committee and our job was to make the verification
process smoother and the forms more user friendly. The problem was that there were about 6 people
too many on this committee and 4 of them had not done a verification in many
years if at all, so the changes they wanted to implement would actually make
the process harder for the employees and less user friendly for the students
and parents.
In
the end the employees were frustrated because they were not asked their
thoughts on the forms and there should have been at least one counselor on the committee
to help since they are on the front lines every day with students and parents
answering questions. If a decision is
made quickly and effectively everyone will feel that they are being heard and
processes can be implemented faster and the flow is smoother which leads to
more productivity for everyone involved.
Some
impediments to good decision making that Marcia listed in the video include not
having the right talent in key decision roles and leadership behavior getting in
the way because there is no open and constructive debates before the decision
is made. So if you have leaders who just
want to implement decisions and do not take a little bit of time to actually
think about how these decisions can affect the bottom line, there may end up
being more talk after the decision has been implemented and doesn’t work. This
cause more issues such as a possibility of going back to the drawing board,
retracting that decision which may have customers, employees, board members, etc.
questioning the leadership ability or the company’s strategy. Marcia also pointed out that companies are becoming
more complex with more companies evolving to reach more markets so they become
more complicated. Organization charts
look more like road maps these days so it is hard to keep it simple sometimes.
In addition to the 4 elements that Blenko suggests
(quality, speed, yield and effort) I would add strategy, alternatives,
reasoning, and feedback. Strategy is
important because as companies evolve and change, products improve or customer
demands change it becomes important that your strategy is well thought out and
you are prepared for changes that will happen.
Alternatives would be great to have in place if a decision is made and
for some reason it doesn’t work or needs to be tweaked you have back up
plan. So if Plan A doesn’t work then
Plan B can be put into play. This would
work well in the planning part of the decision making. Reasoning is important for
the simple fact of asking ourselves why we are doing this. What is the reason we need to make these
decisions? Why didn’t it work
before? Feedback would go well with
Alternatives because if you can get feedback on what worked and what did not
you can then make necessary changes that are needed in order to implement more
effective decisions.
What I can take away from this exercise is that decisions
affect each department as well as the organization as a whole so these
decisions need to contain the 4 elements that Blenko mentions such as quality,
speed, yield, and effort as well as incorporating the ones I listed. Our department is smaller and it is easier to
have everyone involved to hear ideas and thoughts on how implementing new
processes will affect the students as well as the counselors. Some decisions are out of our control as they
come from changes with Federal Regulations however we can be sure that we are
getting that information out to our students and parents in a timely manner and
that it is done in a way that makes sense and encourages them to ask
questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment